PLANETIZATION and the Human Union

MUJCA-NET's
ENDORSERS

GROWING TRENDS  

Ramadan Reflections

Truth is our Trench

A BRIEF MESSSAGE FROM OUR SPONSORS

Don't miss the Chicago Conference June 2nd-June 4th

9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future : http://911revealingthetruth.org

As my recent Capital Times op-ed put it:

"Be there, or resign yourself to a future of endless war, lost liberty, and a craven media that cannot bring itself to breathe a single word of truth."

Special MUJCA offer: Free Loose Change 2 DVD with any order! The controversial 9/11 documentary Loose Change 2 is sweeping the planet -- and it's even being shown in Parliament by former Labour MP Michael Meacher. (Will Meacher be wearing a Guy Fawkes mask?) In honor of this powerful, well-made film, we'll tuck a free copy of Loose Change 2 into any package we send out, starting today. Thanks to Cory for permission to do this, and to Dylan, Cory and Jason for a terrific film that is already changing the world. (DVDs available at http://mujca.com
; and we still have a few items left from the MUJCA Shop.)

* * *

MUJCA News 5/18/06

1) Prayers, Meditations, and Reflections

2) Jon Gold Supports Ray McGovern

3) Satire: The Emperor’s Plane Is Very Smartly Dressed

1) Prayers, Meditations, and Reflections

More than a year ago, MUJCA-NET began asking people to pray or meditate for 9/11 truth. We urged people to take a few minutes around lunchtime on Friday -- the time of the Muslim congregational prayer -- to do pray in solidarity with Muslims, who have been the biggest victims of 9/11-instigated hatred. Former Bush I official Catherine Austin Fitts helped launch this idea, and BYU physicist Steven Jones has recently endorsed and developed it.

Now Matt of Milwaukee Veterans for 9/11 Truth (v911t.org) along with Steven Jones and others, have come up with the idea of focusing our prayers at a single moment, in order to maximize their effect. (Hey skeptics: For scientific reasons to think that focused prayer can work, check out physicist Casey Blood and psy researcher Dean Radin.) This group has begun praying for truth at 9:11 Central Time. Stay tuned for further developments...
MUJCA-NET has also proposed to ask Muslims to help further the process of healing and reconciliation by reflecting on the tendency of many Muslims to want to blame Jews for the 9/11 attacks. This desire to blame a whole group of people, based on the assumed or imagined deeds of a few, is profoundly mistaken. It is also a mirror image of the way non-Muslims have been blaming Muslims! We are working on an article about the "no Jews died in the Towers" rumors that will hopefully put those rumors to bed once and for all, while urging all of us to reflect on our own tendencies to fall into shallow, stereotyped thinking that can lead to murderous hatred. And speaking of which...

2. Jon Gold Defends Ray McGovern, 9/11 Truth

Are those who have spoken out against the mostly-Jewish neocons -- like ex-CIA official Ray McGovern -- prejudiced against Jews? Jon Gold, a Jewish 9/11 truth activist, says no way! His article is reproduced below. Related question: Does 9/11 complicity begin and end with the neocons? Jeff Wollack, a Jewish English professor and 9/11 truth supporter, argues that it does not, and that Brzezinski-style "realists" and a Bush-family-linked hidden network of crypto-nazis are leading 9/11 suspects. We hope to showcase Dr. Wollack's argument in an upcoming MUJCA News. Meanwhile, here is Jon Gold's excellent article.

The 9/11 Truth Movement Is Not Anti-Semitic And Neither is Ray McGovern

By Jon Gold
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10023

What I call, "The PNAC Newspaper (The Weekly Standard)" has decided to publish a "hit piece" against Ray McGovern. They did so because Mr. McGovern, the brave man that he is, confronted Donald Rumsfeld on the lies leading up to the Iraq War.

You would think that the Weekly Standard would be compelled to rebut what Mr. McGovern had to say with information showing he was wrong. Because such information doesn't exist, they instead decided to label him a "Conspiracy Theorist", and tried to make him appear anti-semitic by incorrectly referencing his acronym for "O.I.L.", and by referencing certain "Israel/9/11 pamphlets" handed outside of the famous "Downing Street Memo Hearings" led by Rep. John Conyers.

They claim that Ray's acronym for "O.I.L." is "O stands "for oil; I for Israel; and L for logistics, logistics being the permanent . . . military bases that the U.S. wants to keep in Iraq."

On 9/11/2004, Mr. McGovern took part in what was called, the "9/11 People's Commission" in Washington D.C.

At that Commission, he stated that the acronym for "O.I.L" was "O for oil, I for Israel, and L for the logistical bases necessary to exert (inaudible) military capability in that part of the world."

However, BEFORE he said that, he spoke about the PNAC's dream of invading Iraq. He spoke of eliminating any possible threat to the state of Israel. He spoke of the 14 permanent military bases in Iraq, and so on.

I know, because I was there, and he was answering my question when he said it.

As it turns out, Mr. McGovern was absolutely right.

In regards to oil, on March 28th, 2001, General Tommy Franks testified before the House Armed Services Committee. In that testimony he stated:

"The Central Region is of vital interest to the United States. Sixty-eight percent of the world's proven oil reserves are found in the Gulf Region and 43 percent of the world's petroleum exports pass through the Strait of Hormuz. The developing energy sector of the Central Asian States, with the potential for discovery of additional oil reserves, further emphasizes the importance of the Central Region to America and the world."

If oil has nothing to do with the war in Iraq, then why can't we have access to all of the documents pertaining to Dick Cheney's "Energy Task Force"?

What we have been able to see states:

• "America in the year 2001 faces the most serious energy shortage since the oil embargoes of the 1970s."

• "Estimates indicate that over the next 20 years, US oil consumption will increase by 33 percent, natural gas consumption by well over 50 percent, and demand for electricity will rise by 45 percent."

• "US energy consumption is expected to increase by about 32 percent by 2020. Between 2000 and 2020, US natural gas demand is projected by the Energy Information Administration to increase by more than 50 percent. Yet we produce 39 percent less oil today than we did in 1970, leaving us ever more reliant on foreign suppliers. On our present course, America 20 years from now will import nearly two of every three barrels of oil & a condition of increased dependency on foreign powers that do not always have America's interests at heart."

Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that the Oil Executives lied when they said they didn't meet with Cheney? Those same Oil Executives making a killing recently? Maybe.

In regards to Israel, the President has promised on multiple occassions to defend Israel against her enemies so that's not a hard one to prove. However, since we're also talking about 9/11, I think it's important to point out that the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow said, "I'll tell you what I think the real threat [is] and actually has been since 1990 - it's the threat against Israel."

On March 13th of this year John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt from Harvard released a study on the Israeli lobby's influence over American policy decisions. In that study they stated:

"The situation is even more pronounced in the Bush Administration, whose ranks include fervently pro-Israel individuals like Elliot Abrams, John Bolton, Douglas Feith, I. Lewis (“Scooter”) Libby, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and David Wurmser. As we shall see, these officials consistently pushed for policies favored by Israel and backed by organizations in the Lobby."

As to whether or not Israel had anything to do with 9/11, I don't know. It hasn't been proven. I know that Israel does not control the United States military. However, there is a lot of information available out there that would make someone think that maybe they did.

If they did help to make 9/11 happen, does that mean it's ok to hate all Jews? Of course not. If our Government was responsible for 9/11, does that mean we should hate all Americans? Israel is a country, which has a Government, and Judaism is a religion. It is important to remember that the actions of Israel's Government should not reflect on how people think of Jews.

One last thing. In regards to the logistical placement of bases, If we're not staying in Iraq permanently, then why are we building a massive new embassy just east of al-Samoud, a former palace of Saddam Hussein's?

I am Jewish. I see people who do try to push anti-semitic views onto the movement, but luckily, the majority of the movement is smarter than that. We are smarter than the Weekly Standard would lead you to believe. We want anyone and everyone who was involved to be held held accountable. Be it Christian, Jew, Neocon or Zionist, we want accountability. Period.

If the 9/11 Truth Movement is anti-semitic, than what am I doing here? Last time I checked, I respected the religion of my family.

Stop trying to paint the 9/11 Truth Movement as anti-semitic because it isn't, and neither is Ray McGovern.

3. MUJCA-NET Co-Founder Sells Out...Again!
Not content with applying for a $150k job as a US military translator (http://mujca.com/darkside.htm) MUJCA-NET co-founder Kevin Barrett has decided to REALLY sell out this time...and try his hand at (gasp!) mainstream journalism. Below is his first, and hopefully last, effort.
 

The Emperor’s Plane Is Very Smartly Dressed

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Pentagon on Tuesday released the first video images of the emperor’s plane crashing into the military headquarters building in full regalia.

The images, recorded by Pentagon security cameras outside the building, were made public in response to a December 2004 Freedom of Disinformation Act request by Sartorial Watch, a public interest group whose motto is “let’s put some teeth in fashion law.” Some still images from the video, which a few crazy conspiracy theorists had employed to argue that the plane was naked, had previously been leaked and publicly circulated.

The airplane is smartly dressed in a classic black-and-white tuxedo and specially tailored chartreuse matador pants as it crashes into the Pentagon at ground level. Almost instantly a magnificent white flash and a huge orange fireball appear on the video, followed by a tower of gray-black smoke, as the audience breaks into sustained applause. The groundswell of wild cheering following the plane’s magnificent entrance leaves no doubt that the audience had witnessed a glorious display of sartorial splendor, as eyewitness accounts by military-industrial-complex drones had already amply confirmed.

Traveling at an estimated 350 mph to the tune of Strauss’s The Blue Danube Waltz, the emperor’s plane is seen wearing a magnificent royal purple bow tie beneath its windshield, while a black beret perched smartly above the cockpit gives the Boeing airliner a jaunty “je ne sais quoi” look. The perfectly-tailored tuxedo clings alluringly to the muscular contours of the plane’s fuselage, providing a striking accent to the white silk sleeves around the giant airliner’s wings.

The video’s release was intended to quell obscene speculations by conspiracy theorists, who are obsessed by perverted fantasies about the plane’s alleged nudity. One such lunatic was reported to have greeted the video by remarking, “Clothes, hell! I don’t even see an airliner!” before being hauled away by Homeland Insecurity agents.

Osama Bin Laden, who is said to be devouring William Blum books in his cave in Afghanistan, could not be reached for comment.

---------------------------------------------------------

Impossible to Prove a Falsehood True:  Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity

by George Nelson, Colonel, USAF (ret.)

The precautionary principle is based on the fact it is impossible to prove a false claim. Failure to prove a claim does not automatically make it false, but caution is called for, especially in the case of a world-changing event like the alleged terror attacks of September 11, 2001. The Bush administration has provided no public evidence to support its claim that the terror attacks were the work of Muslim extremists or even that the aircraft that struck their respective targets on September 11 were as advertised. As I will show below, it would be a simple matter to confirm that they were - if they were. Until such proof is forthcoming, the opposite claim must be kept in mind as a precaution against rushing to judgment: the 911 hijackings were part of a black operation carried out with the cooperation of elements in our government.

In July 1965 I had just been commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in the U. S. Air Force after taking a solemn oath that I would protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and that I would bear true faith and allegiance to the same. I took that oath very seriously. It was my constant companion throughout a thirty-year military career in the field of aircraft maintenance.

As an additional duty, aircraft maintenance officers are occasionally tasked as members of aircraft accident investigation boards and my personal experience was no exception. In 1989 I graduated from the Aircraft Mishap Investigation Course at the Institute of Safety and Systems Management at the University of Southern California. In addition to my direct participation as an aircraft accident investigator, I reviewed countless aircraft accident investigation reports for thoroughness and comprehensive conclusions for the Inspector General, HQ Pacific Air Forces during the height of the Vietnam conflict.

In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.

Following a certain number of flying hours or, in the case of landing gears, a certain number of takeoff-and-landing cycles, these critical parts are required to be changed, overhauled or inspected by specialist mechanics. When these parts are installed, their serial numbers are married to the aircraft registration numbers in the aircraft records and the plans and scheduling section will notify maintenance specialists when the parts must be replaced. If the parts are not replaced within specified time or cycle limits, the airplane will normally be grounded until the maintenance action is completed. Most of these time-change parts, whether hydraulic flight surface actuators , pumps, landing gears, engines or engine components, are virtually indestructible. It would be impossible for an ordinary fire resulting from an airplane crash to destroy or obliterate all of those critical time-change parts or their serial numbers. I repeat, impossible.

Considering the catastrophic incidents of September 11 2001, certain troubling but irrefutable conclusions must be drawn from the known facts. I get no personal pleasure or satisfaction from reporting my own assessment of these facts.

United Airlines Flight 93

This flight was reported by the federal government to be a Boeing 757 aircraft, registration number N591UA, carrying 45 persons, including four Arab hijackers who had taken control of the aircraft, crashing the plane in a Pennsylvania farm field.

Aerial photos of the alleged crash site were made available to the general public. They show a significant hole in the ground, but private investigators were not allowed to come anywhere near the crash site. If an aircraft crash caused the hole in the ground, there would have literally hundreds of serially-controlled time-change parts within the hole that would have proved beyond any shadow of doubt the precise tail-number or identity of the aircraft. However, the government has not produced any hard evidence that would prove beyond a doubt that the specifically alleged aircraft crashed at that site. On the contrary, it has been reported that the aircraft, registry number N591UA, is still in operation.

American Airlines Flight 11

This flight was reported by the government to be a Boeing 767, registration number N334AA, carrying 92 people, including five Arabs who had hijacked the plane. This plane was reported to have crashed into the north tower of the WTC complex of buildings.

Again, the government would have no trouble proving its case if only a few of the hundreds of serially controlled parts had been collected to positively identify the aircraft. A Boeing 767 landing gear or just one engine would have been easy to find and identify.

United Airlines Flight 175

This flight was reported to be a Boeing 767, registration number N612UA, carrying 65 people, including the crew and five hijackers. It reportedly flew into the south tower of the WTC.

Once more, the government has yet to produce one serially controlled part from the crash site that would have dispelled any questions as to the identity of the specific airplane.

American Airlines Flight 77

This was reported to be a Boeing 757, registration number N644AA, carrying 64 people, including the flight crew and five hijackers. This aircraft, with a 125-foot wingspan, was reported to have crashed into the Pentagon, leaving an entry hole no more than 65 feet wide.

Following cool-down of the resulting fire, this crash site would have been very easy to collect enough time-change equipment within 15 minutes to positively identify the aircraft registry. There was apparently some aerospace type of equipment found at the site but no attempt was made to produce serial numbers or to identify the specific parts found. Some of the equipment removed from the building was actually hidden from public view.

Conclusion

The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items, plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode.

With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the government's theoretical version of what actually caused the total destruction of the buildings, let alone proving the identity of the aircraft. That is the problem with the government's 911 story. It is time to apply the precautionary principle.

As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history.

Footnote: It will soon be five years since the tragic events of 9/11/01 unfolded, and still the general public has seen no physical evidence that should have been collected at each of the four crash sites, (a routine requirement during mandatory investigations of each and every major aircraft crash.) The National Transportation Safety Board has announced on its website that responsibility for the investigations and reports have been assigned to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but there is no indication that mandatory investigations were ever conducted or that the reports of any investigations have been written.

http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm