Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth
"The Important Thing is, Not to Stop Questioning" –
|Contact | Home||
...Things fall apart; the center cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity...
(William Butler Yeats, January 1919)
Dear William Rivers Pitt,
Dancing and dancing and dancing around the terrible secret, feeling crazy because reality doesn't fit, not understanding how it all fits together... surely you must know that what you are dancing around is 9/11?
Please don't call me a conspiracy theorist. As a writer you surely understand the two words conspiracy and theory enough to know that a conspiracy theorist is someone who has an idea about two or more people planning something bad. Like anyone who thinks anything bad was ever planned by 19 Arabs and an old man in a cave. I am also a conspiracy theorist if I think that my two sons worked together to steal some cookies, one distracting me while the other grabbed the booty. And your grasp of political maneuvers will also remind you that the political right abuses completely innocuous phrases and words which describe completely innocuous people, like the f-word, feminist, or the L-word, Liberal; use of the innocent phrase "conspiracy theorist" to demonize certain people is not a surprise nor should you be susceptible to it.
If you believe the government story about 9/11 then indeed nothing makes sense. The wars aren't connected, the Constitutional rights abuses aren't connected, the apparent hypnotization of the masses which allows all those people to get away with it isn't connected. And of course nothing makes sense in the actual story either. The FBI doesn't connect Bin Laden to the crime. There were no Arab names on the flight lists. You can't hijack a plane with a razor blade. If you are going to hijack a plane on a suicide mission you don't write your will and put it into your suitcase to take with you. in fact, you don't pack a suitcase. None of the Arabs could fly. None of the four pilot/co-pilot pairs tapped the simple 4-digit hijack code that they all know and takes a split second to do. The FAA lost track of the planes (if they did that very often, we'd have a real problem with crashes in mid-air). The military took over an hour to scramble jets for a fourth hijacking when one plane a little off-course gets scrambled and escorted by 4 fighter jets within ten minutes (This had already happened flawlessly 67 times during 2001). The most protected building in the world by the most sophisticated system in the world doesn't notice a passenger plane heading directly towards it and does nothing to stop it. The fog of war? But there was no war. They don't expect attacks from overseas? What do they think the Russians/Chinese/whoever are going to do, fly into Atlanta for a transfer before they attack?
Those are just a few of the hundreds of anomalies which adds up to a story so full of holes there's no fabric left. The families of the victims asked the 9/11 Commission to answer over 400 questions. They answered less than half. David Ray Griffin has written a book called "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions" which is a wonderful companion to the report or read alone. This book describes among many topics the hours of testimony from witnesses which were discarded—simply because their testimony didn't fit the official story. Even the Keane and Hamilton themselves have now declared the report to be a disaster never meant to succeed.
Did Popular Mechanics convince you that all the questions had been answered? It's hard to tell a lie from the truth, but when it violates the laws of physics, as every non-demolition theory of the collapse/explosion of the towers does, it's more likely the former. Did you know that there was a $1 million prize for anyone who could propose a sensible theory by which the towers could have exploded the way they did without use of controlled demolition? In six years no one has even tried. Even the NIST report stops at the moment it says collapse of the buildings was "imminent" and don't explain the way it happened. And no report has even tried to explain why building seven, which collapsed 5 hours later in exactly the fashion of a controlled demolition, could have done so—except when owner Larry Silverstein slipped and said he gave the order too 'pull it', the term meaning trigger a controlled demolition. David Ray Griffin helps to tell lie from fact as he reacts to the Popular Mechanics book and other '9/11 debunkers' in his new "Debunking the 9/11 Debunkers." Again, read them together and see which one makes sense.
Please stay with me on this. People who speak out on 9/11 get punished. They also get ignored by the mainstream media (MSM). Thus media figures who have looked into the evidence and seen enough to want to write about 9/11 truth accurately are scared and have no incentive to write the unbiased articles that many of them would like to write. Editing comes from the top these days and the how many thousands of MSM media outlets: Radio, TV, Newspapers—are now owned by 5 corporations with every reason to keep the politicians in charge happy. Please check out Barrie Zwicker's Towers of Deception for the inside view of a media figure trying to get the truth or at least questions about what the truth is published. Thus I had believed strongly up until now that you knew about 9/11 but, like everyone else, were keeping quiet to save your reputation, your job, contacts, career, life.
But after reading your painful account of your confusion, I fear that you have wrapped your senses into crazy configurations so that you do not have to believe something staring you in the face. The secret in the center of the room. It's right there. Everything else revolves around it.
Another terrific read is Webster Griffin Tarpley's "9/11 Synthetic Terror," which debunks anyone of the idea that our government 'wouldn't do that to us.' Every war that we have fought in has been the result of a False Flag event: A faking of an enemy attack to bring the country into war against that enemy. Think about it for a minute: Would any nation ever REALLY be stupid enough to attack the United States? Precedents range back to early history, with the burning of Rome. Hitler's Reichtags Fire was his 9/11 that convinced the Germans to go to war to start WWII. The people of a country never benefit from war; it is the men who direct it from above. Therefore to get a country to go to war, which creates incredible profits for the war businesses and military, an administration has to fool its people into thinking they have been attacked. Please google "Operation Northwoods" for a completely publicly outed plan of the United States to provoke war against Fidel Castro in Cuba. Remember the Gulf of Tonkin?
When people question the official story we are met largely with insults; ad hominem attacks. If anything is discussed in the media at all it is the same tired 15 or so topics: Was the hole big enough in the Pentagon for a plane? Well, after the top of the building crashed down well after the apparent collision, it might have been. Where are the passengers? This is a funny one. After all, not only are we suggesting that the government killed 3,000 people in the towers for this stunt, but we also can all see the thousands of Americans, not to mention the currently almost 80,000 Iraqis and Afghans killed in these faked wars. Why would anyone doubt that they would be too squeamish to do away with a few bodies? And a few more that I'm sure you've run up against. Generally no mention is made of the other 300 or so questions that need asking. For a great list of questions please go to
But if it's so obvious then why don't people just ignore the media and shout out the truth? In fact, if it's so obvious then why haven't you yourself figured it out yet? That's not an insult. Do you know anything about post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)? Imagine you are raped (This is supposed to be horrible. Imagine it.). Then imagine you are shown the film of your rape 30 times. Do you want to think about it again? Do you want to talk about it? What is your visceral reaction when you remember it? Panic, horror, turning away. Now imagine your country is attacked by terrorists. You see the jets fly into the buildings and you hear the description of what has happened. It hits you like a fist in the stomach. You will never forget where you were when you first learned about it. Then imagine you are forced to see the images of the planes hitting the buildings and the buildings crumbling over and over and over for weeks after the events. Now imagine that your government lets you know who did it but tells you it could happen again anytime, anywhere; even lets you know every day how likely it is that it will happen that day with a system of color alerts. How do you feel about it? Do you want to analyze it? Most people have a knee-jerk reaction when they encounter 9/11 truth. They refuse to listen; they refuse to talk; they insult those making them think about it again. Anger is foremost. Anger comes from hurt and fear.
You received a gash in your psyche. Do you want to open up an old wound again which has healed, though badly, or is healing, to see what is inside? Do you want to rip off the scab and make it hurt all over again, or let it heal the way it is? What if I tell you there is an infection inside and you have to reopen the wound or gangrene will set in, eventually killing you? That's what I'm telling you. This country has gangrene. You see it all around you. This is what is making you crazy. You see rot from the left, the right, north west east south and none of it makes any sense; it's all disconnected. Except that something does connect it. The secret in the middle. The scab that hurts when you touch it, which all the gangrene leads to. Only when you remove-- OUCH!! OW!! STOP!! -- the scab will it make sense.
Please visit some of these sites (these are just a few) when you have a moment and follow the links.
There are many, many more very well researched sites and articles.
Here's another way to introduce yourself to the questions. Download and watch a few of these films:
Much more information is available through, for instance, this link (scroll down) listing research essays and media articles:
Lastly: Once you have learned enough to believe there are valid and scary questions to ask, and good reasons to do so, please take heart: A new 9/11 investigation will, come hell or high water, begin in January 2009 through a NYC ballot initiative which will be voted on in November 2008. That is, if people like you support it. It will be an international project and will be scientific, non partisan, transparent, and thorough. The Commissioners are open to facts but are not yet convinced that 9/11 was a lie. They are well-known people who you will recognize: William Pepper, Col. Bob Bowman, Ed Asner, Edgar Mitchell, Lincoln Chafee, Bishop Thomas Gumbleton...
The effort was grassroots in 2007 and the link to the project is
Within a few weeks the site will go up for the 2008 professional, mainstream version inspired by the 2007 project. At that time, the same link will lead you to the new site.
And as for those primarily in government who scream in opposition to a new investigation: What have they got to hide/ what have they got to be scared of?
Please take this all very seriously because an intelligent person like you should not have to feel like he is going crazy. It all makes sense. It really does.
for peace & truth & justice
PS write back if you get a chance...