ADVISORY: Independent Scientist Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred
Webre to call for International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
VANCOUVER, B.C. - In order to prosecute the 9/11 perpetrators under
the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act, Independent Scientist/DU Radiation
Expert Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre will call for the
establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, in a
public announcement to be made at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference on
Sunday June 24, 2007.
Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, an international lawyer and Member of the
Pro Tem Committee for the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal to
be held in 2008, will make the announcement in an address to the Vancouver
9/11 Truth Conference, on the issue of "The International 9/11 Citizen's War
Crimes Tribunal: The 9/11 False Flag Operation as a War Crime under
International Law." According to Moret and Webre, 9/11 was a False Flag
Operation by an international War Crimes Racketeering Organization, to
provide a pretext to engage in Genocidal & Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU)
bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq) in order to secure vast oil
and uranium reserves; to roll out a Terror-based National Security
state-system world-wide; and to implement the final stages of a world
DATE/TIME OF 9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL ANNOUNCEMENT:
Sunday, June 24, 2007 at 6PM PDT @ Main Stage
The Maritime Labour Centre
1880 Triumph St., Vancouver, B.C. V5L 1K3
The purpose of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to prosecute the perpetrators
of the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001, under the 9/11
Independent Prosecutors Act for War Crimes, including Genocide, Crimes
Against Humanity and Crimes Against Peace (now Aggressive War), as set out
in the Nuremberg Principles, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute of
the International Criminal Court.
The 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act appoints an Independent Prosecutor under
the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute
Treason against the United States of America by U.S. President George W.
Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense
Donald H. Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying
out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the U.S.
Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be
carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001,
as part of a False Flag Operation. Article III of the U.S. Constitution
provides that, "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist
only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving
them aid and comfort...."
The main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the
named individuals - U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President
Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the
power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11,
2001 are contained in a Legislative Memorandum to the U.S. Congress
accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. This Legislative
Memorandum was co-authored by expert researcher David Ray Griffin,
independent scientist Leuren Moret and attorney Alfred Webre.
The facts recited in the Congressional Memorandum constitute prima facie
evidence that the named individuals---U.S. President George W. Bush,
U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H.
Rumsfeld---and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty
of Treason against these United States under Article III(3) of the U.S.
Constitution. For the full Congressional Memorandum, go to:
Memorandum: Summary of Prima Facie Evidence of Treason
A Summary of the
threshold of prima facie evidence is as follows.
I. The attacks of 9/11,
as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard
operating procedures between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and
NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon, under the leadership of Donald
Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD's
response, which means that at least two of them are false. Moreover, the
third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission, is contradicted by a wide
range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a
timely fashion. There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have
come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House.
II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and
Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the
application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible
space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or HAARP. But al-Qaeda operatives
could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the
explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down.
Nor could al-Qaeda operatives have obtained command and control of advanced
Directed Energy Weapons, 4th generation mini-nuclear weapons,
bunker-busters, or other exotic weapons alternatives such as HAARP that are
known to be in the deployment or testing phase in the US Defense arsenal.
The controlled demolition and/or Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or exotic
weapons application such as HAARP, therefore, had to be the work of U.S.
Government and other insiders. That President Bush was one of those
insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were
principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at the
highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of
evidence (the collapsed steel), which at a crime scene is normally a federal
offense. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the
consent of the President and the Secretary of Defense (as suggested in the
previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of
the buildings - and/or with the use of exotic weapons such as Directed
Energy Weapons or HAARP - implies their involvement in the latter as well.
III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on
the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could not be true is
evident from many facts: Alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour's incompetence; the
choice of the Pentagon west wing as the target; the impossibility of a
commercial airliner's coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the
Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with
an attack by a Boeing 757. That the strike was an inside job is implied by
the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by
a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government's refusal
to release videos of the strike. This operation could hardly have been
planned without the involvement of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.
9/11 & DU at the Pentagon
In April, 2007, Leuren Moret exposed the U.S. military's illegal use of
Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in target practice in Hawaii, in violation of
U.S. military environmental regulations. The elevated radiation readings
she recorded were carried by ABC-TV news in Hawaii on April 29 & 30, 2007.
Leuren Moret reported similar elevated radiation readings downwind from the
Pentagon in Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001. Two days after 9/11,
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed that the Pentagon
crash site rubble was radioactive and that the probable contaminant was
Depleted Uranium (DU). The entry and exit holes through the Pentagon crash
site were the signature of a kinetic energy penetrator, such as a Cruise
missile, and the term "punch-out hole" was written by crash site
investigators over the exit hole. This is a military term used for kinetic
energy penetrators. Major Doug Rokke, former Director of the Gulf War I DU
Cleanup Team, reported that an email from the Pentagon 30 minutes after
impact confirmed a Cruise missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11. Recently vast
Uranium deposits have been reported in Khazakhstan and Afghanistan.
Khazakhstan is expected to out-produce Canada (now the world's top producer)
in Uranium production within 12 years. This exposes the economic interests
behind the events of 9/11, specifically the unjustified military attack by
the U.S. on Afghanistan using 9/11 as a pretext.
IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also
indicated by President Bush's remaining at the Florida Elementary school
after it was evident---given the truth of the official account---that the
United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behavior makes sense
only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no
attack on the school.
V. The complicity of Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and
the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary of
Transportation Norman Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the
9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow,
as to when Cheney went to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC)
and when he issued the shoot-down authorization.
VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the Bush administration
orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had
some huge projects---prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining
funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the
military---that would likely be possible only in the event of "a new Pearl
The establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is
justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have failed to
assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11.
Representative John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the U.S. House of
Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed
the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following
the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with
representatives of the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. The Chairman
refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior
Staff. The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush
and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions.
Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal
Prosecutor Act - Executive Summary
Memorandum: Summary of Prima Facie Evidence of Treason
Explosions - Brasscheck TV (Video)
Leuren Moret – Bio
Alfred Lambremont Webre,
JD, MEd - Bio
KITV Hawaii - Depleted
Uranium Hawaii (2 Mins 33 Seconds)
Leuren Moret – Expert
Testimony at the Tokyo International Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan
DU: Dirty Bombs,
Missiles, Bullets by Leuren Moret
Alfred Lambremont Webre,
Campaign for Cooperation in Space
Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal
# # # # #
URL of this article:
Support MUJCA-NET MUJCA-NET needs your support. We are a
non-profit organization and the scale of our activities depends
entirely on your generosity. We would like to get copies of David
Griffin's two 9/11 books (see above) into the hands of every
religious leader in America. And we would like to push 9/11 truth
onto the front pages of every newspaper in America. But we can't do
it without your help. If you would like to donate to MUJCA-NET,